A Plea for Dialogue: An Open Letter on Catalonia
from constitutional & international law scholars
co-sponsored by the Center for Constitutional Transitions & the Edinburgh Centre for Constitutional Law
We, the undersigned, strongly believe that a peaceful, democratic and mutually acceptable resolution of the conflict over the political status of Catalonia is in the vital interest of all concerned inside and outside the borders of Spain. Any other outcome would undermine the capacity of its institutions to protect the equal dignity of all Spanish citizens, betray the foundational ideals of the European Union, and violate the basic principles of international legal order. On October 1, the Spanish government took a dangerous step in that direction. In its attempt to prevent the referendum on Catalan independence, it resorted to excessive force, further escalating an already disturbingly tense constitutional standoff.
More often than not, such crises have a tendency to take a turn for the worse. With this in mind, Mr. Puigdemont’s prudent decision to choose a different route—to delay the adoption of the unilateral declaration of the independence of Catalonia, and seeking to find a solution to the political status of Catalonia through dialogue with the Spanish state—ought to be applauded.
Though commendable, Mr. Puigdemont’s overture is not fully credible. To dispel lingering doubts about its sincerity, Mr. Puigdemont’s government would do well to abandon one of its most dubious claims: the existence of a sufficiently clear pro-independence majority among the people of Catalonia. As recent events demonstrate, many Catalans are uncomfortable with the option of independence, or are openly opposed to it. Even in societies far less polarized, the will of the majority is one among several factors that determine the legitimacy of a sovereignty referendum.
There is no doubt that the Spanish government did everything in its power to suppress voter turnout—to our mind, unwisely and illegitimately—both well before, and on the day of, the independence referendum. This, however, does not mean that a freely organized referendum would have resulted in a sufficiently strong popular mandate to pursue the secession of Catalonia from Spain. In fact, the gap between the percentage of Catalans who in past regional elections voted for pro-independence parties, and those who voted for parties explicitly opposed to independence, has not been sufficiently large to suggest that the majority of Catalonia’s citizens prefer independence over less radical constitutional alternatives, some of which may even escape existing categories and classifications. Whatever the outcome, a new constitutional settlement must command widespread allegiance. Wherever it lies, such allegiance will need to be ascertained credibly: fairly, democratically and, to the greatest extent possible, accurately.
Perhaps emboldened by a particular interpretation of international law, Mr. Rajoy’s government appears indifferent to the aspirations of millions of Catalans who wish to be governed differently: in a state with which they will identify more intensely and comprehensively. As do many governments around the world who find themselves in similar situations, the Spanish government responds to such aspirations repressively, thinking that such responses carry no repercussions under international law.
We disagree. Irrespective of Mr. Rajoy’s judicious attempts not to be seen as someone who undermines the autonomy of Catalonia, his strategy of arresting and prosecuting individuals on charges of sedition is unsustainable in the long run. Were it to continue, the state’s repression of secessionist aspirations would not only cause large-scale violations of individual human rights across Catalonia, but could amount to the violation of the Catalans’ collective right to ‘internal’ self-determination.
While Mr. Rajoy claims to be open to negotiation, his call for dialogue will remain unpersuasive as long as he keeps responding to peaceful secessionist challenges heavy-handedly. We applaud his commitment to the rule of law, but we are highly skeptical of his inclination to use tactics that cannot but erode the social foundations which make that ideal a lived reality. Though the arrests of prominent Catalan sovereigntists may be legal, we doubt that they contribute to the ethical, social and political objectives which the ideal of legality serves in practice. More importantly, Mr. Rajoy’s proclaimed openness to constitutional reform is unlikely to be taken seriously without demonstrating readiness to accept as legitimate the possibility of an independent Catalonia. We are convinced that the best way for Mr. Rajoy to dispel lingering doubts about the sincerity of his calls for dialogue is to make clear that his government will not simply dismiss democratically verified demands for Catalan independence as unconstitutional, but rather that it will engage them in good faith: empathetically and open-mindedly.
Whatever its flaws, a freely organized and impartially policed democratic referendum is still the best vehicle for determining the grassroots support for such a demand. Instead of treating a referendum as a useful device that allows political actors to address radical shifts in popular affections more dispassionately, respectfully, and creatively, the Spanish government chose police repression and criminal prosecution. Rather than harming Catalan secessionism, such repression and prosecution harms Catalan and Spanish democracy—and with it the capacity of Spanish institutions to sustain their authority without violence. The alternative is clear: Mr. Rajoy and Mr. Puigdemont must commit to constitutional negotiations on the basis of a more accurate picture of Catalan political aspirations, and in conformity with the constitutional rights of all. Anything else would be a dangerous step in the wrong direction.
Sujit Choudhry, Director, Center for Constitutional Transitions & I. Michael Heyman Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley @sujit_choudhry
Robert J. Howse, Lloyd C. Nelson Professor of International Law, NYU School of Law @howserob
Zoran Oklopcic, Associate Professor, Department of Law & Legal Studies, Carleton University @ZoranOK
Asanga Welikala, Director, Edinburgh Centre for Constitutional Law & Lecturer in Public Law, School of Law, University of Edinburgh @welikalaa
Ali Acar, Visiting Scholar, Osgood Hall Law School
Richard Albert, Professor of Law, Boston College Law School
Paul Anderson, PhD Candidate in Politics, Canterbury Christ Church University
Matej Avbelj, Associate Professor of European Law, Nova Univerza
Miriam Bak McKenna, Post-Doctoral Fellow, Lund University
Monica Badia, Senior Project Manager and Content Editor of the Social Observatory "la Caixa", Cambridge University
Gad Barzilai, Professor of Law, Vice Provost, Dean Emeritus of Law, University of Haifa
Karlo Basta, Assistant Professor, Memorial University of Newfoundland
Jenna Bednar, Professor of Political Science, University of Michigan
Violeta Besirevic, Professor of Constitutional Law, EU Law and European Human Rights Law, Union University Law School
Harihar Bhattacharyya, Professor of Political Science, Burdwan University
Paul Blokker, Associate Professor, Charles University
Vito Breda, Professor of Comparative Law, School of Law and Justice, University of South Queensland
Ana Cannilla, PhD candidate in Law and Sessional Lecturer, School of Law, University of Reading
Linda Cardinal, Professor, Research Chair in Canadian Francophonie and Public Policies, University of Ottawa
Wen-Chen Chang, Professor, College of Law, National Taiwan University
Francois Crepeau, Oppenheimer Professor of International Law, McGill University
Hugo Cyr, Dean, Faculty of Political Science and Law, Université du Québec à Montréal
Paul Dermine, PhD Candidate in EU Law, Maastricht University
Avigail Eisenberg, Professor and Chair of Political Science, University of Victoria
Gennaro Ferraiuolo, Professore associato di Diritto costituzionale - Università di Napoli Federico II
Giuseppe Ferrari, Professor of Constitutional Law, Università commerciale Bocconi
Alkmene Fotiadou, Research Associate, Centre for European Constitutional Law
Pierre Foucher, Dean, Faculty of Political Science and Law, Université du Québec à Montréal
Andrew Friedman, Head, Constitutionalism and International Rule of Law, London Centre of International Law Practice
Alain-G. Gagnon, Canada Research Chair, Professor of Political Science, UQAM
Jean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens, Dean of Law, University of Montreal
Fabien Gélinas, Sir William C. Macdonald Professor of Law, McGill University
Tom Gerald Daly, Associate Director, Edinburgh Centre for Constitutional Law & Fellow, Melbourne Law School
Jörg Gerkrath, Professor of Public Law, University of Luxembourg
Sassan Gholiagha, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, WZB Berlin Social Science Center
Pedro Gil Vila, Lawyer, ICAB
Michael Goodhart, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh
Jurgen Goossens, Assistant Professor of Constitutional law, Erasmus University Rotterdam and FWO Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Ghent University
Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Donna Greschner, Professor, University of Victoria
Gabor Halmai, Professor and Chair of Comparative Constitutional Law, European University Institute
Jonathan Havercroft, Associate Professor, University of Southampton
Tamás Hoffmann, Senior Research Fellow, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
France Houle, Associate Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Montreal
Richard Kay, Oliver Ellsworth Research Professor and Wallace Stevens Professor Emeritus, University of Connecticut School of Law
Soeren Keil, Reader in Politics and International Relations, Canterbury Christ Church University
Jan Klabbers, Academy Professor, University of Helsinki
John Kierulf, author and independent disarmament researcher
David S. Law, Charles Nagel Chair of Constitutional Law and Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis & Sir Y.K. Pao Chair in Public Law, The University of Hong Kong
Jean Leclair, Full Professor, Université de Montréal
Patrick Macklem, William C. Graham Professor of Law, University of Toronto
Chibli Mallat, Prof of Law, University of Utah
John Markoff, Distinguished University Professor, Department of History, University of Pittsburgh
John McGarry, Canada Research Chair on Nationalism and Democracy, Queen’s University
Armand de Mestral, Emeritus Professor, Faculty of Law, McGill University
Michael Meyer, Executive Director, Democracy Reporting International
Jeanne Morefield, Professor of Politics, Whitman College
Michel Morin, Full Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Montreal
Karis Muller, Retired Senior Lecturer, European Studies and French, Ausralian National University
Kalypso Nicolaidis, Professor of International Relations, Director of the Centre for International Studies, Faculty Fellow, St Antony’s College, University of Oxford
Phoebe Okowa, Professor of Public international law, Queen Mary, University of London
Ghislain, Otis, Canada Research Chair on Legal Diversity and Indigenous Peoples, University of Ottawa
Pablo Ouziel, Post-Doctoral Fellow, University of Victoria
Charles-Maxime Panaccio, Associate Professor University of Ottawa
Cesare Pinelli, Professor in Constitutional Law, Sapienza University of Rome
Johanne Poirier, Peter MacKell Chair in Federalism, McGill University
Francisca Pou Giménez, Assistant Professor, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de Mexico (ITAM)
Bob Rae, Ann and David Wilson Distinguished Professor of Public Policy Victoria University and Distinguished Fellow at School of Public Policy
Nikolas M. Rajkovic, Professor and Chair of International Law, Tilburg University
Bruce Ryder, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
Elizabeth Sanderson, Instructor, University of Ottawa Faculty of Law (previously, senior official, Canadian Justice Department)
Toni Selkälä, Doctoral Candidate, University of Turku
Amal Sethi, Doctoral Candidate in Law, University of Pennsylvania
Nikos Skoutaris, Lecturer in European Union Law, School of Law, University of East Anglia
Irene Sobrino Guijarro, Senior Lecturer on Constitutional Law, Universidad de Sevilla
Jason Sorens, Lecturer of Government, Dartmouth College
Maximilian Steinbeis, Editor, Verfassungsblog
Milena Sterio, Professor of Law, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Dejan Stjepanović, Lecturer in Politics, University of Dundee
Costas Stratilatis, Assistant Professor, University of Nicosia
Ruti Teitel, Ernst C. Stiefel Professor of Comparative Law, New York Law School
Stephen Tierney, Professor of Constitutional Theory, School of Law, University of Edinburgh
Roberto Toniatti, Professor of Comparative Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, University of Trento
Carlos Fernandez Torne, Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
James Tully, Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Law, Indigenous Governance & Philosophy, University of Victoria
Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
Renata Uitz, Professor and Chair of Comparative Constitutional Law, Department of Legal Studies, Central European University
Martine Valois, Associate Professor of Law, Université de Montré
Amy Verdun, Professor of Political Science, Jean Monnet Chair Ad Personam, and Distinguished Lansdowne Fellow in European Integration, University of Victoria
Mila Versteeg, Class of 1941 Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law
Neil Walker, Regius Professor of Public Law and the Law of Nature and Nations, University of Edinburgh
Mark Walters, F.R. Scott Professor of Public and Constitutional Law, McGill University
Peter Wesley-Smith, Formerly Professor of Constitutional Law, University of Hong Kong
Antje Wiener, Professor of Political Science & Global Governance, University of Hamburg / By-Fellow, Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge